Establishing Technological Innovation in MSMEs For Sustainable Finance: The philosophy paradigm of Indonesia

Establishing Technological Innovation in MSMEs For Sustainable Finance: The philosophy paradigm of Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58223/taamul.v4i1.389

Keywords:

Islamic banks, Digital Money, Innovation, Sustainability, Blockchain, Fintech

Abstract

This study explores how financial technology (fintech) can be developed and positioned within Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia to support sustainable finance through a philosophical and ethical lens. The core problems addressed include unequal access to finance, the capitalist bias in technological innovation, and the lack of ethical integration in fintech development. The study aims to bridge conceptual gaps between technological innovation, ethical finance, and inclusive development. Employing a qualitative research design grounded in interpretivism and constructivism, the research integrates philosophical inquiry with literature-based analysis. Phenomenological and grounded theory approaches are used to examine ethical, behavioral, and Islamic perspectives on fintech usage among MSMEs. The findings reveal that while fintech has the potential to democratize access to finance and accelerate digital innovation, its effectiveness relies on alignment with core values such as trust, justice, transparency, and sustainability. Sharia-compliant fintech models provide an ethical alternative to conventional systems but require regulatory, infrastructural, and cultural support. The study emphasizes the need for fintech solutions that empower rather than exploit and that place human dignity and ethical responsibility at the heart of innovation. This research is among the few to examine fintech adoption among MSMEs from a philosophical perspective, combining postmodern, Islamic economic, and behavioral finance viewpoints. It offers a conceptual framework for humanizing fintech and provides ethical guidance for policymakers and innovators working toward inclusive and sustainable financial ecosystems.

References

Ahn, S. J., & Lee, S. H. (2019). The effect of consumers’ perceived value on acceptance of an internet-only bank service. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(17), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174599

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Aloulou, M., Grati, R., Al-Qudah, A. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2024). Does FinTech adoption increase the diffusion rate of digital financial inclusion? A study of the banking industry sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0224

Amr Mohamed El Tiby Ahmed Wafik Grais. (2014). Islamic Finance and Economic Development: Risk, Regulation, and Corporate Governance. John Wiley and Sons.

Bajgorić, N., Turulja, L., & Alagić, A. (2022). Digital Age, Business Strategy, and Firm’s Performance. In Always-On Business: Aligning Enterprise Strategies and IT in the Digital Age (pp. 11–28). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93959-5_2

Boussard, V. (2017). Finance at Work (International Studies in Money and Banking). Routledge.

Chesbrough, Henry W., and R. S. R. (2000). The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology Spinoff Companies. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 1–2.

Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom R S. Сhaurasia, V., Gupta, C., & Thakur, C. (2017). How Blockchain Could Help Emerging Markets Leap Ahead. Harvard Business School.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research (Issue v. 14). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Dc45DQAAQBAJ

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. In Sage (3rd ed., Vol. 4, Issue 11). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications, Inc.

do Carmo, G., Felizardo, L. F., de Castro Alcântara, V., da Silva, C. A., & do Prado, J. W. (2023). The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: a scientometric review. Scientometrics, 128(3), 1853–1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04625-x

DRAENOS, S. (1982). The Totalitarian Theme In Horkheimer And Arendt. Salmagundi, 56, 155–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40547556

Dwivedi, P., Alabdooli, J. I., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). Role of FinTech Adoption for Competitiveness and Performance of the Bank: A Study of Banking Industry in UAE. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, 16(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-021-00033-9

Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (Edisi ke 10). Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

George, D. . (1987). Critical economics and the moral dimensions of welfare. Review of Social Economy, 45(1), 17–34.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151

Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x

Guenther, J., & Falk, I. H. (2019). Generalising from qualitative research (GQR): A new old approach. Qualitative Report, 24(5), 1012–1033. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3478

Gurley, J. G., & Shaw, E. S. (1955). Financial Aspects of Economic Development. The American Economic Review, 45(4), 515–538. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811632

Kant, I. (2007). Critique of Pure Reason, (2rd ed.). Springer.

Kohardinata, C., Suhardianto, N., & Tjahjadi, B. (2020). Peer-to-peer lending platform: From substitution to complementary for rural banks. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.12606

Kraus, S., Bouncken, R. B., & Yela Aránega, A. (2024). The burgeoning role of literature review articles in management research: an introduction and outlook. Review of Managerial Science, 18(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00729-1

Kristiansen, J. N., & Ritala, P. (2018). Measuring radical innovation project success: typical metrics don’t work. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2017-0137

Lawson, T. (2015). Essays on: The Nature and State of Modern Economics ((1st ed.)). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724416

Mainardes, E. W., & Freitas, N. P. de. (2023). The effects of perceived value dimensions on customer satisfaction and loyalty: a comparison between traditional banks and fintechs. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 41(3), 641–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2022-0437

Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798959

Ponterotto, J. . (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126

Sabaruddin, L. O., & Putra, F. H. R. (2023). A Critique of Business Model Innovation. In A. Rehn & A. Örtenblad (Eds.), Debating Innovation: Perspectives and Paradoxes of an Idealized Concept (pp. 123–138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16666-2_7

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson, New York.

Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford:Blackwell.

Shepherd, W. G. (1972). The Elements of Market Structure Author ( s ): William G . Shepherd Source : The Review of Economics and Statistics , Vol . 54 , No . 1 ( Feb ., 1972 ), pp . 25-37 Published by : The MIT Press Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/1927492 Accessed : 09. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54(1), 25–37.

Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and Trends of Financial Technology (Fintech): A Systematic Literature Review. Information, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. M. Y. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management Authors ( s ): David J . Teece , Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen Published by : Wiley Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088R archive indicates your a148 Accessed : 24-03-2016 16 : 22 UTC Your use of the JSTO. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., Scott, S., & Martinez-Moya, D. (2024). Inside out: The interplay between institutions and digital technologies for SMEs performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 36(1–2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2208555

Veloutsou, C., & McAlonan, A. (2012). Loyalty and or disloyalty to a search engine: the case of young Millennials. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211206375

Walter, C. (2016). The financial Logos: The framing of financial decision-making by mathematical modelling. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 597–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.022

Zolfagharian, M., Walrave, B., Raven, R., & Romme, A. G. L. (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), 103788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Mujennah, M., Narsa, I. M., & Tjaraka, H. (2025). Establishing Technological Innovation in MSMEs For Sustainable Finance: The philosophy paradigm of Indonesia. Ta’amul: Journal of Islamic Economics, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.58223/taamul.v4i1.389

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...