Impeachment Mechanisms in Indonesia: Safeguarding Democracy through Presidential and Vice-Presidential Removal

Impeachment Mechanisms in Indonesia: Safeguarding Democracy through Presidential and Vice-Presidential Removal

Authors

  • Mursyidi Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan
  • Syafiudin Kholiq Zaini Islamic University of Medina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58223/syura.v3i2.488

Keywords:

Democracy, Impeachment, Dismissal, president and/or vice president

Abstract

emocracy represents the embodiment of Indonesia’s state system, which upholds popular sovereignty and guarantees the rights of its citizens, including the freedom of association and assembly. These rights are enshrined in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), which serves as the foundation for the protection of human rights. The freedom to associate and assemble also serves as an essential means for citizens to determine the direction of national leadership, including the election of the President of the Republic of Indonesia. Within the constitutional system, the President holds a central role as both head of state and head of government. However, after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, significant changes occurred in the President’s position and accountability mechanism. The President is no longer responsible to the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) and cannot be dismissed merely on political grounds or through a vote of no confidence. This study aims to analyze the shift in the President’s position after the constitutional amendments, particularly regarding the impeachment mechanism as stipulated in Articles 7A and 7B of the 1945 Constitution. The research employs a normative legal method with a statute approach and conceptual analysis of legal documents and scholarly literature. The findings reveal that the impeachment mechanism reflects the principle of checks and balances within a modern presidential system. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of constitutional protection, governmental stability, and the rule of law in Indonesia’s democratic practice.

References

A. Zamakhsyari Baharuddin, A. R. (2019). IMPEACHMENT PERSPEKTIF KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA DAN KETATANEGARAAN ISLAM. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.9689

Akbar, A. (2021). Inkonsistensi Tentang Pemberhentian Kepala Negara Menurut Konstitusi Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Politik Dan Sosial, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v2i1.15

Dinarta, D., & Irwandi, I. (2021). ANALISIS YURIDIS PROSEDUR PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN DAN/ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM MASA JABATAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/limbago.v1i2.13394

Faiz, P. M., & Redhani, M. E. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Peran Kamar Kedua Parlemen dan Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521

Mulia Sari, Zahlul Pasha Karim, & Muhammad Siddiq Armia. (2023). Analisis Siyāsah Qaḍhā’iyyah Terhadap Pemberhentian Presiden Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.56

Nazriyah, R. (2003). Urgensi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Proses Pemberhentian Presiden. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol10.iss23.art7

Prayitno, H. B. (2021). Proses Pemakzulan (Impeachment) Presiden Menurut Uud Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dihubungkan Dengan Hak Untuk Menyatakan Pendapat DPR-Ri. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.32493/skd.v8i2.y2021.16799

Saputra, F., & Muksalmina. (2020). KEKUATAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM HAL PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN DAN/ATAU WAKIL PRESIDEN. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v6i2.361

Sari, N., & Iskandar, H. (2022). Pemberhentian Presiden dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Borobudur Law and Society Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31603/6075

Shela Natasha, I. &. (2018). KEKUATAN HUKUM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI BAHAN PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT DALAM PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan, Ekonomi Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v10i1.869

Susanto, M. (2017). Wacana Menghidupkan Kembali GBHN dalam Sistem Presidensil Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.427-445

Widya, U. (2022). Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 Pasca Perubahan. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol7.iss1.art15

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

How to Cite

Mursyidi, M., & Zaini, S. K. (2025). Impeachment Mechanisms in Indonesia: Safeguarding Democracy through Presidential and Vice-Presidential Removal. Syura: Journal of Law, 3(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.58223/syura.v3i2.488

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...