Kekuatan dan Batas Judicial Review dalam Arsitektur Hukum Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58223/syura.v3i1.387Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Judicial Review, Constitution, State, Indonesian Legal SystemAbstract
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia grants judicial review authority to two state institutions: the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. However, the dualism of this authority has led to potential legal problems in its implementation, both conceptually and practically. This study aims to analyze the mechanism of judicial review within Indonesia’s legal system and to evaluate its effectiveness and consistency in upholding constitutional supremacy. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that the division of judicial review powers between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court creates inefficiencies and the possibility of inconsistent rulings. Additionally, there is ambiguity in the delineation of authority, which may lead to institutional conflicts and weaken constitutional oversight. Based on these findings, the study recommends a restructuring of the judicial review system in Indonesia by consolidating the authority under a single institution—the Constitutional Court. This consolidation is expected to strengthen constitutional oversight, ensure legal certainty, and enhance the effectiveness of the national legal system. The main contribution of this research lies in providing a conceptual and juridical basis for reinforcing the role of the Constitutional Court as the sole authority for judicial review, thereby promoting a more coherent, responsive, and constitutionally grounded legal order in Indonesia
References
, A., & , M. (2013). PROBLEMATIKA PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN (JUDICIAL REVIEW) PADA MAHKAMAH AGUNG DAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11070
Andiraharja, D. G. (2021). Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Fungsi Ajudikasi Konstitusional di Indonesia. Khazanah Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i2.9012
Buriticá-Arango, E. (2024). Judicial Review of Legislation and Tyranny of the Majority: A Critical Analysis of the Judicial Protection of Minorities in Democratic States. In Revista Derecho del Estado (Issue 58). https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n58.07
Hamid, R. Al. (2020). Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Batas Usia Perkawinan(Tinjaun Undang-undang Hak Asasi Manusia dan Perlindungan Anak). Ushuluddin International Conference (USICON), 4.
Idris, M., & Umar, K. (2020). Dinamika Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Perkara Judicial Review. Siyasatuna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’Iyyah, 1(2).
Maslul, S. (2023). JUDICIAL RESTRAINT DALAM PENGUJIAN KEWENANGAN JUDICIAL REVIEW DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i3.496
Satria, R., Fitriani, R. A., Astono, A., & Purwanto. (2022). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kaitannya dengan Proses Penyidikan : Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor : 130/PUU-XIII/2015. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v2i2.67
Siahaan, M. (2021). Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Nur, A. I., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848
Winda Indah Wardani, & Laga Sugiarto. (2023). Perbandingan Desain Isu Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Thailand. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.55
Wulandari, D. A., & Budyatmojo, W. (2022). Pengujian Undang-Undang (Judicial Review) Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Souvereignty, 1(4).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syura: Journal of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
